Saturday, April 25, 2009

The Sanchez Scenarios

With Matthew Stafford already locked up as the No. 1 overall pick, all eyes turn to USC QB Mark Sanchez. Where will he fall? Some late-night ESPN viewing can clarify some things:

- Chris Mortensen said there is about a 20% chance the St. Louis Rams will take Sanchez at No. 2

- Both Mel Kiper and Todd McShay believe Sanchez will go off the board when the Seattle Seahawks picks at No. 4.

- Denver Broncos head coach Josh McDaniels told Ed Werder that he does not believe his team will trade up to take Sanchez, nor would he be a lock if he fell to No. 12, the Broncos' first of two first-rounders. He also said the team has not contacted anyone about trading up, but admitted that the Jacksonville Jaguars have contacted him about moving up to No. 8.

- Sal Paolantonio caught up with New York Jets General Manager Mike Tannenbaum after a draft meeting, and the GM told the ESPN reporter that his team is in fact interested in moving up from No. 17, most likely to draft Sanchez. Many people believe it would take the Jets' first-rounder, second-rounder and fourth-rounder to move up to No. 8 to draft the QB. Another scenario that has been floated around involves the Cleveland Browns, Brady Quinn and the No. 5 overall pick.

Other late-night notes:
- With 11 draft picks this year, the New England Patriots could possibly move up into the top 10 to draft some defensive help.

And don't forget, the draft day LIVE BLOG kicks off at 3:45 pm ET/12:45 pm PT.

1 comment:

  1. Very well said Mr. Tunkel. Heres just my opinion on the matter; to put it bluntly, Sanchez is not and will not be a franchise QB. I can see him falling all the way down to 13, maybee even becoming another Aaron Rodgers. If im the Jets, im not bothering with him. They have 3 young QB's on the roster, why add a young underclassmen who needs time to improve considering hes only played one year. The Jets need a playmaker. If they trade up, watch out for Jeremy Maclin from Mizzou. If not, expect Darius Hayward Bey

    ReplyDelete